All opinions of the Committee on Professional Ethics are available online here. To locate a specific opinion or opinions, enter the opinion number or keyword in the appropriate search box below. Licensed attorneys may also call 877-953-5535 for access to opinions
-
Canon:
Opinion #: 680
Cite: The Professional Ethics Committee for the State Bar of Texas
Date: September 2018
Under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct may a lawyer use cloud-based client data storage systems or use cloud-based software systems for the creation of client-specific documents where confidential client information is stored or submitted to a cloud-based system?
Read More
-
Canon:
Opinion #: 679
Cite: The Professional Ethics Committee for the State Bar of Texas
Date: September 2018
May a lawyer renegotiate his fixed, flat fee for representing a client in litigation after the litigation is underway if the matter turns out to be greater in scope and complexity than the lawyer and client contemplated?
Read More
-
Canon:
Opinion #: 678
Cite: The Professional Ethics Committee for the State Bar of Texas
Date: September 2018
Under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, may a Texas lawyer agree to serve concurrently as the executor of an estate and as legal counsel for the executor? If not, may another lawyer in his law firm serve as legal counsel for the executor?
Read More
-
Canon:
Opinion #: 677
Cite: The Professional Ethics Committee for the State Bar of Texas
Date: September 2018
May the law partner of a part-time municipal court judge represent defendants in criminal cases pending before other judges in that municipal court?
Read More
-
Canon:
Opinion #: 676
Cite: The Professional Ethics Committee for the State Bar of Texas
Date: August 2018
Do the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct prohibit a lawyer from retaining an expert or intentionally disclosing confidential information to a prospective expert when the lawyer has no substantial purpose other than to attempt to disqualify or otherwise prevent the expert from being used by an opposing party including testifying on the opposing party’s behalf?
Read More
-
Canon:
Opinion #: 675
Cite: The Professional Ethics Committee for the State Bar of Texas
Date: August 2018
May a Texas lawyer, acting as a mediator, prepare and provide the parties to the mediation a proposed written agreement that memorializes the terms of the parties’ agreement reached during the mediation?
If so, may the lawyer-mediator propose terms for inclusion in the written agreement in addition to the specific terms agreed to by the parties during the mediation?
Read More
-
Canon:
Opinion #: 674
Cite: The Professional Ethics Committee for the State Bar of Texas
Date: August 2018
Does a 501(c)(3) public charity nonprofit law firm violate the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct by directly soliciting pro se Texans for the purpose of providing civil legal services at below-market flat-rate fees?
Read More
-
Canon:
Opinion #: 673
Cite: The Professional Ethics Committee for the State Bar of Texas
Date: August 2018
1. Does a lawyer violate the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct by seeking advice for the benefit of the lawyer’s client from other lawyers in an online discussion group?
2. Does a lawyer violate the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct by seeking advice for the benefit of the lawyer’s client through informal, direct consultation with another lawyer in a different firm?
Read More
-
Canon:
Opinion #: 672
Cite: The Professional Ethics Committee for the State Bar of Texas
Date: March 2018
Does a written communication from a lawyer to employees in a particular position constitute direct mail solicitation if the communication does not directly offer to represent the recipients of the communication, but suggests to the recipients that they have claims because they are similarly situated to the plaintiffs in the lawsuit?
Read More
-
Canon:
Opinion #: 671
Cite: The Professional Ethics Committee for the State Bar of Texas
Date: March 2018
May a lawyer, individually or through an agent, anonymously contact an alleged anonymous online defamer in order to obtain jurisdictional information sufficient for obtaining a deposition pursuant to Rule 202 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure?
Read More